Finland's Foreign Minister Elina Valtonen 20241118: If it's the case – I will not say about these attacks – that there's perhaps a state actor behind the acts, then it's foreign and security policy. As stated in NATO resolutions, hybrid actions can also trigger Article Five.
Peter Klevius: You're right, there's probably 'one state actor behind many of these acts', namely desperate $-freeloader (since 1971) US which terrorizes the world in its anti-China mission. However, I doubt Nato would be helpful in dealing with this criminal* rogue state. $-thief (1971) US' global war tentacles and criminal trade and financial practices, sanctions etc. is what Finland and others ought to de-risk themselves from. China is a 100% unlikely suspect - but when a Chinese ship happens to be in the Baltic sea area (Chinese commercial ships are extremelty frequent) then Finnish racist Sinophobic media shouts wolf all it can without any evidence or even reason to suspicion! Being involved in anything like that is the last thing the world's most successful trader needs. Is Nord Stream 4 still intact? After all, it goes beside and crosses the damaged data cables. $-freeloader (since 1971) US destroyed Nord Stream 1, 2, and 3 1923, after US president Biden