Peter Klevius judicial question about Trump's electability case: How come that a "pre-prosecutor" (the January 6th Committee) could initiate a court hearing about something that no court had decided on as yet?!

US "rule of law" is a "democratic" laughing stock! How low has the dollar freeloader (since 1971) US legal system fallen when courts can be used to hinder "unwanted" participants.

Is Nicky Haley (and Kamala Harris) waiting for the Democrats turning Trump into US real* "Navalny"?!

* After all, Trump is popular and a smart politician, i.e. a real challenge, whereas Navalny was nowhere close.

On December 19, 2022, the January 6th Committee voted unanimously to refer Trump and the lawyer John Eastman to the U.S. Department of Justice for prosecution. Recommended charges for Trump were obstruction of an official proceeding; conspiracy to defraud the United States; conspiracy to make a false statement; and attempts to "incite", "assist" or "aid or comfort" an insurrection. Obstruction and conspiracy to defraud were also the recommended charges for Eastman.

However, none of these accusations had any legal standing without a court evaluating them!

Dollar freeloader US "rule based values" , "democracy", and "human rights" constitute a laughing stock but of some funny reason accepted by US obedient clients in US attacks against  China. Remember that  Trump if you end up as the president instead of an imprisoned "Navalny"!

In Peter Klevius 1992 book Resursbegär - 'Resource Beggar' in the Swedish/Nordic creole dialect called English after the Nordic Anglo-Saxons, but perhaps easier understood as 'Demand for Resources' - jurisprudence is defined as (in translation):

The only strictly scientific discipline, jurisprudence (narrowly understood, i.e. excluding the forces that have shaped the legal text) is characterized by fixed/ axiomatic truths in the form of legal texts. A reality or a game constructed by the players themselves. Reconciliation with this absolute truth can either be done or not. The judicial machinery is the experiment that the "case" is subjected to and the result of the experiment is interpreted (i.e. reconciled) by the judges against the legal text. If it is difficult to reconcile, this is only an indication of incomplete experimental data or awkwardness in conducting the experiment. Of course, it may also be the case that perfect reconciliation is impossible.
(P. Klevius: 1992 p 43)

A prosecutor fills a poorly specified pothole between the triggering of a case and the potential transfer of it to a court. And sometimes the court proceedings may constitute the main reason instead of the clarifying weather a break of law has actually occurred.

 

In Demand for Resources (1992 ISBN 9173288411) Klevius crossed the boundaries between consciousness-observation-understanding-language and wrapped it all in one, i.e. adaptation.
According to Klevius analysis everything is adaptation. There's no principal analytical difference between how planets adapt to their star or how humans adapt to their environment. And no dude, this is not "simplifying away" or diluting it. When the bedrock of the Indo-Australian Plate met with the bedrock of the Asian plate the landscape was almost flat. However, look at the Himalayas today. Same rock but a completely different and extremely wrinkled appearance and a new name, mountain range.