IS THE WEST REPEATING ITS US INCITED* FASCIST PAST? After all, although fascism started in Europe, its for-bearer was US 1917 "Red Scare" anti-Communist propaganda against unions and workers.
Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024.
* US, which had cultivated the seed of European fascism, is still a theocracy that has in essenece re-introduced fascist "military citizenship" (now because of the unfounded US made up "the China threat") in which all citizens (incl. US "allies") are involved to the military in some way (compare US steered NATO and US DCA occupations of its "allies"). And "in God we trust" US, the Supreme Court is still 100% "mionitheistic" with six Catholics, two Protestants, and one Jew. In 1929, the fascist regime in Italy got the blessing of the Catholic Church in the fascist anti-Communism propaganda. However, in spite of intense pressure from a "Red Scare" brainwashed US congress to sever relations with the Communist Soviet Union, Roosevelt thought Germany, not the Soviet Union, posed the greatest threat to US hegemony, so he “would hold hands with the devil” if necessary. The idea was then to let the Nationalsocialist (aka "Nazi") German army kill as many Russians as possible so to weaken Russia, while US and UK were able to terrorbomb civilians in an already beaten German homeland which lacked any internal defense at that point. Same ideology - additionally rooted in the racist "Yellow Peril" scaremongering - applied to US policy against China, i.e. to let the Japanese weaken China to the point (1941) when US itself felt threatened by Japan's war successes.
As US 1971 stolen $-hegemony any day now is coming* home to roost, US desperately wants to stop China with whatever means, which strategy of course immensly hurts the wellbeing of the whole world - unless people (YOU) start getting it and puncturing dangerous warmongering and racist Sinophobia!
BBC's cherry picked guest: If the war in Ukraine stops with a deal with Russia, then the West should escalate its threat against Russia. Peter Klevius: I.e. what initiated the wear in the first place!
Why is the elefant in the BBC studio not mentioned, i.e. that US fanatic attacks against China - incl. the Ukraine war - is all about US vulerabilty of losing to tech and science champion China and thereby also losing its criminal hegemony? And not a world about what happened before "the full scale invasion".
Why is UK a war puppet to the most dangerous criminal state in the wprld? The thoroughly avoided elephant in BBC's fascist warmongering room is the geopolitical role of US stolen dollar hegemony and how US pulls its guns to continue escaping its criminal past by the help of the stolen money it's still printing, sorry, counterfeiting*.
* The stolen money amounts to the difference (caused by the "Nixon chock" 1971) between the US steered US dollar and the US steered world dollar. This difference has grown exponentially and faces a double end game, i.e. 1) the real inflation of the dollar which accelerates the uneven wealth distribution, and 2) the power of meritocratic China's superior manufacturing capabilities, which consumers around the world are beginning to understand. Only by utilkizing its stolen hegemony US can still lure many people to believe in US anti-China lies. However, the more they see of Chinese products and science, the more erosion towards the tipping point.
How US robs the world - release the dollar bomb by clicking it!
BBC's senseless warmongering in the service of its US master, and Finnish Iltalehti's consumer misinformation, are both essentially hate speech inciting extreme US led Sinophobia racism.
The history of Western Sinophobia racism should be compulsory in schools.
Jani Ahosola (Iltalehti 20240822): 'Chinese cars always evoke slightly mixed feelings. Many questions arise about the country's conceptions of human rights, the hoarding of critical battery minerals, Taiwan's independence, the citizens' social credit system, and so on. The list could go on.'
Peter Klevius correction of Jani Ahosola's senseless racism and stupidity as a "journalist": Spare your mixed feelings to $-freeloader US! There should be no "mixed feelings" against China because
1) China manufactures the world's most technologically advanced EVs and with the world's by far best quality in each class. A distant second comes China made Tesla, and Europeans brands made in China and spiced with Chinese tech and innovations. US and Europe made cars are even further down the list. Btw, couldn't find any review of a BYD (car of the year in Europe) that came even close to Jani Ahosola's "creative negativity".
2) China has the by far best Human Rights record, because all muslims world organization OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) made a meticulous investigation about Uyghurs in Xinjiang (because of US and BBC produced fake accusations by people related to or supporting terrorist muslims, or simply because of cherry picked individual wrongdoings which also happen in prisons in the West but here were used for smearing China).
And although de-radicalization programs are common both in the West and Mideast etc. (not to even mention US torturous Guantanamo Bay detention camp), the Chinese one's offer education for sharia confined muslim girls and women. Put his in the same context as Israel. China was equally attacked by islamist who raped and slaughtered Han Chinese - and other mudlimd like the Hui (demand to 'kill the Hui' was common among Uyghur jihadi) - but didn't respond with a senseless genocide like Israel despite the raped and murdered Chinese were more than those in Israel.
US on the other hand has not only abandoned Human Rights with a Supreme Court decision, but also constantly violates Human Rights both at home and abroad, and has even legalized torture. Moreover, US not only supports Israel's genocide against Palestinians, but actively participates in the war crimes.
3) United States, Europe, China and others are all investing billions of dollars to acquire access to critical minerals in Africa and South America. So why cherry pick China which anyway gives much more back to Africa and South America through infrastructure and high quality alternative manufacturing?
4) Iltalehti's ignorant Jani Ahosola is quite alone in the world to argue for Taiwan independence, when not even US does it!
5) China's s.c. citizens' social credit system is no different from similar in the West - only technologically more advanced, meaning the West will follow anyway. And thanks to superior super-app technology (that Musk and Zuckerberg are dreamingabout) Chinese citizens are both safer and have much better convenience. Moreover, every citizen in Western Europe are constantly surveilled online and on streets etc. to a point where your credit scores even include people you act together with. On top of this comes $-thief (1971-) US online dictatorship surveillance and spying on everything you do. And if US doesn't like you it can demand your extradition to US jail. On the other hand, if US happens to like you really much and you commit crimes against humanity and are arrested by ICC, US has made a law that gives it the "right" to violently free you from the Hague.
6) And here I finally agree: The list could go on - but not against China which in comparison could stand as a model country. China is under constant cyber- etc. attacks from the world's worst ever desperate militant embezzler US and some of its "allies", and has been forced to increase its security - and then blamed of "authoritarianism" etc.
It's thanks to racist and ignorant China haters like Jani Ahosola, that Finland now is secretly occupied by US nuke carrying military units which not only freely roam in Finland out of reach of Finnish law, but also endangering Finland's security, economy and high tech cooperation with China.
Jani Ahosola perverted misinformation agenda also constitutes a threat against Finnish consumers, companies and scientists. Peter Klevius also suggests him to rethink US lies about the Tiananmen riots.
Here's an other tendentious Iltalehti "report".
Iltalehti: Russia destroyed a children's hospital - Putin just stroked horses.
Peter Klevius: ???! A wild guess is that Putin wouldn't prefer to bomb children's hospitals - that would be more like Israel's war crimes in Gaza, wouldn't it. But for some reason Iltalehti is less interested in Palestinian hospitals than Ukrainian ones.
Yellow Peril
The racist and cultural stereotypes of the Yellow Peril originated in the late 19th century, when Chinese workers (people of different skin-color and physiognomy, language and culture) legally immigrated to Australia, Canada, the U.S., and New Zealand, where their work ethic inadvertently provoked a racist backlash against Chinese communities, for agreeing to work for lower wages than did the local white populations. In 1870, the French Orientalist and historian Ernest Renan warned Europeans of Eastern danger to the Western world; yet Renan had meant the Russian Empire (1721–1917), a country and nation whom the West perceived as more Asiatic than European.[11][12]
Imperial Germany
Kaiser Wilhelm II used the allegorical lithograph Peoples of Europe, Guard Your Most Sacred Possessions (1895), by Hermann Knackfuss, to promote Yellow Peril ideology as geopolitical justification for European colonialism in China.
Since 1870, the Yellow Peril ideology gave concrete form to the anti-East Asian racism of Europe and North America.[11] In central Europe, the Orientalist and diplomat Max von Brandt advised Kaiser Wilhelm II that Imperial Germany had colonial interests to pursue in China.[13]: 83 Hence, the Kaiser used the phrase die Gelbe Gefahr (The Yellow Peril) to specifically encourage Imperial German interests and justify European colonialism in China.[14]
In 1895, Germany, France, and Russia staged the Triple Intervention to the Treaty of Shimonoseki (17 April 1895), which concluded the First Sino-Japanese War (1894–1895), in order to compel Imperial Japan to surrender their Chinese colonies to the Europeans; that geopolitical gambit became an underlying cause of the Russo-Japanese War (1904–05).[13]: 83 [15] The Kaiser justified the Triple Intervention to the Japanese empire with racialist calls-to-arms against nonexistent geopolitical dangers of the yellow race against the white race of Western Europe.
United States
In 1854, as editor of the New-York Tribune, Horace Greeley published "Chinese Immigration to California" an editorial opinion supporting the popular demand for the exclusion of Chinese workers and people from California. Without using the term "yellow peril," Greeley compared the arriving coolies to the African slaves who survived the Middle Passage. He praised the few Christians among the arriving Chinese and continued:
But of the remainder, what can be said? They are for the most part an industrious people, forbearing and patient of injury, quiet and peaceable in their habits; say this and you have said all good that can be said of them. They are uncivilized, unclean, and filthy beyond all conception, without any of the higher domestic or social relations; lustful and sensual in their dispositions; every female is a prostitute of the basest order; the first words of English that they learn are terms of obscenity or profanity, and beyond this they care to learn no more.
— New York Daily Tribune, Chinese Immigration to California, 29 September 1854, p. 4.[29]
In 1870s California, despite the Burlingame Treaty (1868) allowing legal migration of unskilled laborers from China, the native white working-class demanded that the U.S. government cease the immigration of "filthy yellow hordes" of Chinese people who took jobs from native-born white-Americans, especially during an economic depression.[4]
In Los Angeles, Yellow Peril racism provoked the Chinese massacre of 1871, wherein 500 white men lynched 20 Chinese men in the Chinatown ghetto. Throughout the 1870s and 1880s, the leader of the Workingmen's Party of California, the demagogue Denis Kearney, successfully applied Yellow Peril ideology to his politics against the press, capitalists, politicians, and Chinese workers,[30] and concluded his speeches with the epilogue: "and whatever happens, the Chinese must go!"[31][32]: 349 The Chinese people also were specifically subjected to moralistic panics about their use of opium, and how their use made opium popular among white people.[33] As in the case of Irish-Catholic immigrants, the popular press misrepresented Asian peoples as culturally subversive, whose way of life would diminish republicanism in the U.S.; hence, racist political pressure compelled the U.S. government to legislate the Chinese Exclusion Act (1882), which remained the effective immigration-law until 1943.[4] The act was the first U.S. immigration law to target a specific ethnicity or nationality.[34]: 25 Moreover, following the example of Kaiser Wilhelm II's use of the term in 1895, the popular press in the U.S. adopted the phrase "yellow peril" to identify Japan as a military threat, and to describe the many emigrants from Asia.[35]
Boxer Rebellion
In 1900, the anticolonial Boxer Rebellion (August 1899 – September 1901) reinforced the racist stereotypes of East Asians as a Yellow Peril to white people. The Society of the Righteous and Harmonious Fists (called the Boxers in the West) was an anticolonial martial arts organization who blamed the problems of China on the presence of Western colonies in China proper. The Boxers sought to save China by killing Westerners in China and Chinese Christians or Westernized people.[36]: 350 In the early summer of 1900, Prince Zaiyi allowed the Boxers into Beijing to kill Westerners and Chinese Christians in siege to the foreign legations.[36]: 78–79 Afterward, Qing Commander-in-Chief Ronglu and Yikuang (Prince Qing), resisted and expelled the Boxers from Beijing after days of fighting.
Peter Klevius: Still wondering why China has to take care of its defense?!
Comments
Post a Comment