Peter Klevius congratulates Ghana for taking a point against English cheaters* - but thinks they deserved all three points.

* UK not only cheats by playing WC football as several separate countries while playing track and field as one (Team GB).  

It seems that England benefits from referee bias. Moreover, England also seems to be very lucky in which group they end up in international tournaments etc. favorable decisions. Does it really benefit those who want to be proud of their team?


Harry Maguire's 2018 WC clumsy cheat must be one of the worst in football history. After all, he dived inside the penalty area without no one even close to touch him. And his plan seems to have been that he should have got in contact with the defender. However, the defender elegantly avoided him. Harry Maguire is also notorious for using his big frame to aggressively push down players so to get headers - without referees reacting. Why? Because he played for England.

Sam Wallace (Telegraph Sport): There were knife-edge moments for England twice in the latter stages when Honduran referee Saíd Martínez decided that breakaway attacks from the African side did not end in fouls by English players. Both involved the substitute Prince Kwabena Adu. On the first occasion, Jordan Pickford jumped at him and Martínez decided that the Ghana man had made the contact as he ran through. If it had been the other way around, it would have been a red card for Pickford. Then Martínez decided that Ezri Konsa did not foul Adu as he ran on goal in the 79th minute, even though it looked very much like there had been contact from the England defender. But it will not just have been those decisions that upset Ghana manager Carlos Queiroz. Generally speaking everything that might have been a split decision went England’s way and a few more besides.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Peter Klevius 'existencecentrism' explains why you can believe in ghosts but not in God - and not even think about a God other than the one imprisoned in your head.

Image
Read how Peter Klevius solved "the biggest mystery in science" . A recorded public time-line of Peter Klevius original research on evolution, consciousness, existencecentrism, anthropology and sociology 1979-2012 - and some thoughts about self-citation   Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline . Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024.  Read how climate change made human evolution possible in SE Asian volatile archipelago - not on a continent like Africa .  Peter Klevius opposite reading and correction of Greenland data compared to researchers biased with climate hysteria .  Read how two craniopagus twins born 2006 solved the "greatest mystery in science" - and proved Peter Klevius theory from 1992-94 100% correct .    Read Peter Klevius thesis Pathological Symbiosis in LVU on how a hoax child-psychoanalytic concept is st...
Read more

Because Peter Klevius - whose EMAH solved* "consciousness, the biggest mystery ever" 1990-94* - can't get the Nobel prize due to "anonymity" and "islamophobia" (i.e. defense of Human Rights) it should be given to the craniopagus twins Krista and Tatiana Hogan (born 2006) who proved him right!

Image
Acknowledgement : Peter Klevius unique access to a bias free scientific realm (a blessing and a curse) is a combination of a high IQ brain*, lack of economic ties**, lack of religious or "spiritual" bias, and a life history starting with being kidnapped to an other country at age two and then at age 17 kicked back penniless to his country of birth, where he had to work instead of university. Add a deep interest in science ignited at age 13 by mathematician Clas-Olof Selenius (dad of Peter.s childhood friend Carl-Olof). This has made Peter Klevius an intellectual coward only picking low hanging fruits that are "forbidden" due to academic PC bias - and therefore often mistakenly seen as a bragger but actually making him the most cautious/humble scientist avoiding loose speculations, such as e.g. what is often happily published in Nature etc. fueled by biased peer reviews (see e.g. the chapter Science and References in Peter Klevius 1992 book Demand for R...
Read more

How the pliocene-pleistocene Panama isthmus debunks wild rafting "theories" and confirms Peter Klevius' calm out of SE Asia* human evolution analysis!

Image
* Without DNA and our latest findings, but being a geologist, Eugene Dubois was perfectly right when he already 1891 searched in the right place and discovered "the missing link" of his time, i.e. what he named Pithecanthropus erectus, now called Homo erectus, in SE Asia. Peter Klevius thinks 'pithecus' is still more appropriate considering that Homo habilis and Homo floresiensis, like Dmanisipithecus, all lack what is considered the classic "Homo" erectus trait, i.e. full modern human like bipedalism. We were wrong about the brain, and now it's apparent we were also wrong about bipedalism. Dubois founded paleo-anthropology by not only finding the fossils, but he also analyzed them in a wholly new way by pulling human fossils out of the context of racial identification and shoved it into an evolutionary context.    Acknowledgement : Peter Klevius unique access to a bias free scientific realm (a blessing and a curse) is a combination of a hi...
Read more